Canada’s 8th largest city with a population of 642,843 and a metropolitan area of 2,328,000 people can be celebrated not only for its beautiful geographical surrounds, but for its excellent land use practices which have only enhanced the natural environment.
Vancouver was founded as a Canadian port city by the British for trade with countries across the Pacific. By the early 1900’s Vancouver developed into a flourishing port city, being the terminating point for the Canadian Pacific Railway, leading to transportation, operational and logistics management and the harvesting of natural resources to become the biggest drivers of the city’s economy. As the demand for natural resources grew, so did the city.
The extensive trade network which was made possible by Vancouver’s geographic location, has allowed for further development as the demand for natural resources have grown in direct correlation with China’s rapid urbanization. The city’s ability to harvest, process and deliver construction material has not increased only through exportation; it has substantially grown due to high amounts of recent residential development around the city center.
The majority new development has been largely funded by Hong Kong investors, some due to speculation leading up to and following the 2010 winter Olympics, but a majority which has met increasing demands of a growing population. (As of January 2009, Vancouver held less than a 1% vacancy rate on residential apartments) The new density in part can be attributed to the city’s adoption of smart growth principals which have tried to limit the amount of sprawling development outside the city center, in the hopes to limit heavy investment in additional automobile infrastructure.
As a result of policy, demand, speculation and zoning Vancouver illustrates intelligent land use principals, ones which produce an incredibly unique and clear diagram when compared to various cities I observed around the US.
Due to the city’s coastline, land has been placed at a premium, and intelligent use of space has become inherent to the city’s development. The two major routes of transportation to the heart of the CBD have been developed into major commercial corridors for ground level retail, which transition and vary as they pass through the neighboring districts. The center of the bulbous peninsula harbors the majority of work space which has preferenced the areas closer to the coastline for prime residential development. As an alternative to utilizing the edge of the city’s coast for infrastructure (as is the case in many cities around the US) and by instead moving those routes inward, residential high rises have benefitted by holding unobstructed access to the water for parkways and water recreation for the wealthy tenants. This has allowed for some of the most profitable real estate per square foot to boast the greatest amenities as well, allowing these sites to yield even higher returns. Vancouver’s CBD in effect becomes near hidden in the skyline, crowded out by residential towers which occupy the perimeter. While this creates a somewhat unique form of urbanism, the unfortunate effect is that this has produced some of the highest living expenses in the world with the average home price at $987,500 as of April 2010.
While in many ways this land use has prioritized the mega rich, what I found fascinating about Vancouver was the use of ‘in-between’ spaces which did not fall into the predominate diagram. The city’s East end, has preserved dozens of pre-1900’s masterpieces from the areas early wealth as a shipping hub.
While still active industrial sites, such as the one imaged below, almost seamlessly integrate itself into one of Vancouver’s design schools coupled with a converted warehouse retail district and a series of residential units within walking distance.
And of course, one of the most well-known assets to Vancouver is its beloved Stanley Park. Which for all intense and purposes can be seen to function as a natural reserve literally inches away from a grand metropolis, allowing for terrific 360 degree views of the city and its surrounding areas.
The beauty of this planning which has led to dense, walk able live/work/play conditions that is the mantra of progressive 21st century cities, leaves still very important questions which smart growth and speculative development fails to answer, and a problem that urban economist Edward Glasser identifies in his book the Triumph of the City.
Is it possible to generate desirable dense urban areas that are affordable to more that the top 1% wage earners? Now that more than 50% of the world’s population lives in what is defined as a urban area, how can we ensure these regions to be available to all? What does the new economy have to look like in order to ensure this? What will our cities have to look like in order to make this possible? One could only hope that an intelligently designed city such Vancouver will hopefully find ways to answer these troubling questions in its years to come.