Abstract 1: Architecture as Economic Initiative

  

 

   

It is the intent of the Crisis City Collaborative to seek out defined or perceived crises within our cities and propose ways in which architecture’s role can be mediated or transformed to offer alternative systems and modes of thinking as a means to mitigate present issues.   

In seeing the city as an economic construct and recognizing its sustainability is contingent upon economic processes, my thesis will explore the ways in which architecture exists and can engage with the vital capital process. It is innovation and invention that allows for cities to maintain relevance. Failure for cities to adapt and retool lead to gradual decline and lead them to be matters of obsolescence within the global economy.   

A city is in crisis when it fails to function as a sustainable economic unit, incapable of serving the widespread financial needs of its inhabitants. Most cities within the ’rustbelt’ of the US have failed to retool themselves to a degree necessary to advance in the global markets of information technology, microelectronics, renewable energy, biotechnology and advanced materials. These giants of post industrial US exhibit stubborn economies, gradually leading to population decline, poverty, and urban blight as invention and production levels diminish.   

The link between the city and economics have been both synergetic and parasitic. Urbanity exists as a byproduct of economic exchange but it also helps feed it. As a location expands and becomes more ‘urban’ it often begins to see industry specialization break off into separate markets as businesses attempt to define themselves in hopes for a customer base, leading to greater diversification and producing more resilient economies. Corporations generate the capital that produces the city, and the spatial relationships of the urban condition stage opportunities for further invention and creation.   

In a global economy cities have become increasingly fluid. Barriers such as transportation, communication, tariffs, etc. have largely been overcome, producing what Thomas Freidman refers to as a ‘flat world’ condition. The development of transnational corporations by both their name and very existence prove this heightened non-alliance to place.   

Without a large draw or incentive there is no longer corporate responsibility to place, and America’s Midwestern cities prove this. In order for cities to offer stability and growth there must be a greater sense of loyalty and identity to help attract and retain development.   

Through this process, architecture’s existence has been predominantly downstream from all economic decision making practices. It is one of the most highly responsive systems to economic conditions and its very existence acts as a physical representation of past and present industry development. The only moments when architecture has developed beyond the reflective image of capitalism, and acted as an economic agent itself, has been through successful speculative development.   

In effect speculation and branding are the only tools in which architecture holds to influence the resurgence and retooling of cities with diminishing innovation. It is important for architecture to play this role as it can then act as a means to revitalize and reinvent both the social and economic structures of these cities. It is this relationship between innovation – the city, and speculation – architecture that I would like to explore for my thesis. As a means to better understand the implications of speculative development my research will look at both successful and failed speculative projects, considering current and historic rates of unemployment and overall population changes and regional quality of life rates. Further research will attempt to analyze corporate loyalty to place, programmatic structures which create stronger entrepreneurial qualities, and attempt to uncover the conditions which allow for cities to act as centers for growth and innovation on a micro scale.   

   

     

Bibliography   

Bishop, Bill. 2008. The Big Sort. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Companies. 

 

 

Political studies which analyses how America has become increasingly ideologically polar between regions and what this might mean for our country and communities moving forward.   

Florida, Richard. 2009. The Great Reset.  

 Discusses how the economy will reshape after our current recession. Through analyzing past economic ‘resets’ Florida discusses the phenomenon of geographically transformative capital that lead to moments of economic prosper, analyses different city industry bases and what the future might hold for them.  

 Florida, Richard. Who’s Your City?: How the creative economy is making where to live the most important decision of your life. New York: Basic Books, 2008.   

Florida has created a city rating system, considering opportunities, entertainment, job offerings, cost of living, etc. and complies this data to help determine desirability of cities in the US. These factors offer helpful criteria for valuation.   

 Florida, Richard. Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.   

Florida famously discusses the importance of young, educated, creative individuals and how their talents are working to reshape geography around America.   

 Fainstein, Susan. 2005. CITIES AND DIVERSITY Should We Want It? Should We Plan For It? New York: Columbia University.   

Analyses the importance of visual and cultural diversity within our cities and tries to determine the extent to which thee are beneficial, as well as analysis several community types in terms of resilience and economic productivity.   

 Ingels, Bjarke. 2008. YES IS MORE: An Archicomic Architectural Evolution.    

An architect who uses iconography and simple branding as a means to address a larger audience. In his discussion regarding his work it is clear that he has a fairly well versed knowledge of building development principals and gladly accepts those into the design. His mode of working attempts to appear controlled at times but its reality is that it is often contingent.   

 Jacobs, Jane. 1969. The Economy of Cities. New York: Random House.   

Sets the stage for an age of urban theorists to recognize that is it cities, rather than nations what are the true generators of wealth. Her notions towards import replacement and city growth have made a strong impact on economic theorists and remains influential to this day.   

 Jacobs, Jane. 2000. The Nature of Economies. New York: Random House.   

Discusses the similarities between ecological development and economic development, encouraging the discipline to recognize these factors are in sync with one another and therefore compatible.   

 Koolhass, Rem. 2006. Found In Translation. Ubiquitous China.   

Koolhass, briefly discusses the financial process of the architectural process of working to get bids and how to follow through with clients.   

 Till, Jeremy. 2009. Architecture Depends. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.   

Looks at the Contingency of architecture and how the profession makes attempts to constantly appear to clean things up and have a smooth linear process. Architects tend to want to ignore the outside forces at work instead of working with them.   

 Willis, Carol. 1995. Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.   

Details the relation between zoning, finance and building’s end form. It contends that these are the factors which differentiated the architectural styles between Chicago and NYC skyscrapers.   

    

 

~ by James Conley on 2010/09/29.

8 Responses to “Abstract 1: Architecture as Economic Initiative”

  1. James,

    The idea of branding, (from what I am able to glean) is where you are “putting your money” for your thesis contention. I would use it in the first paragraph, more often, and as concisely as possible. The contention has many good points, but lacks clarity. Try picking out 4-5 words that ARE your thesis. Construct the entire abstract around these terms in relation to branding, or if you have chosen a site, how this specific “term” has manifested or may manifest itself according to the a priori establishment that you would like to position your project under the “vital capital process.”

  2. The progression of your abstract is good, economics is certainly something to address in the realities of our world. I think you need to define your method of research though. I am very interested in your method of research as I do not know what it is. You specify many strands and interesting narratives dealing with economics, I would tighten up your argument and what exactly you are delving into. It seems you are interested in exploiting the current economic system so that architecture is not defined by the absurd unexplainable fluidity of the economic empires?

    In your last paragraph you sum up your interests. How do you define ‘speculative project’. Everything can be speculative, ironically all our thesis are speculative developments on a set of theories or issues. My point is – define your terminology – this is true for everyone. And more importantly I am interested in seeing some diagrams that connect your ideas and thus produce a way forward in your method of research. some of the body of the abstract could be taken out or written more concisely to allow for this to be discussed. Graphics would be nice to see.

    “Without a large draw or incentive there is no longer corporate responsibility to place, and America’s Midwestern cities prove this. In order for cities to offer stability and growth there must be a greater sense of loyalty and identity to help attract and retain development.” The ‘architecture of development’ which established this condition and allowed for an ‘identity’ – is this the very thing you wish to use? I apologize I am cynical/question economics principles and I am about to diverge on a tangent. I will ask do we as a human race need to even perpetually continue a model of ‘growth’. I am getting at more existential questions here but – why is a recession bad – it is inherent in capitalism – inherent we have a system of management which requires unemployment – why do we even have human notions that ‘unemployment’ is bad. Obviously in an economic world it is all bad because it is run by monetary need.

    Lastly, there are many ‘types’ of crisis. For the sake of this critique I will say that there are predominantly two: the tangible physical [earthquake, no more food] and the more ethereal [identity, psychology] – one can argue economics is a less tangible reality that manifests itself in real physicality, this is how we know there is a housing predicament. I think your abstract is a great start to your economic interest, just remember the most interesting thing you can do as is applying architecture and process to this. Cheers.

  3. General Site: Rust Belt
    Specific Site: Unknown

    Themes: Economy, globalization, Image (speculation), Place/Identity.

    I love your intro sentence about Crisis City. Clearly Korman pulled this out because it is the best summarizing sentence I have heard (hope you dont mind if I borrow it). I would suggest you add impending, emergent, or upcoming after present and before issues… also perhaps: mitigate (these) issues?

    In your first sentence I was struck by your use of the word sustainability. This goes for all of us, but do you mean the words literal definition (the ability to preserve or last) or its more popular connotation of environmental fortitude?

    I feel like a lot of your statements are heavy handed (which I guess is ultimately good because it allows for rebutting) and are not cognizant of varying view points. For example:

    “It is innovation and invention that allows for cities to maintain relevance.” Relevance is subjective and I might argue that your statement is true within capitalism, however cities have other ways in which they are relevant… Isnt Detroit and most rust belt cities relevant because there lack of innovation and invention?

    Later on… I think you should acknowledge the fact that some people would argue that a good city is a city that has “obsolescence within the global economy.”

    What is a “sustainable economic unit” ?

    Financial needs (economics) are certainly susceptible to crisis, but would you acknowledge that in wake of many other crises, financial needs are an abstraction? (Im just going on a personal vendetta at this point, my apologies) I guess I am just generally concerned for the singularity at which you see economics as being crucial to the city… everywhere I turn you seem to slip in the word economic as an adjective… cities are based on exhange… not just economic exchange, but cultural, intellectual, even sexual exchange. Corporations have a huge impact on producing the city but so do taxes and the decisions of every day citizens.

    I would also suggest you read critiques to Thomas Friedmans’s ‘flat world… I am not that familiar with them but I know quite a lot of contemporary thoughts challenges this notion (Gabby had a similar critique in her comments so maybe you should talk to her).

    I do like your contention that “in order for cities to offer stability and growth there must be a greater sense of loyalty and identity to help attract and retain developlment.” I recognize this is a fact, and I would ultimately find it more interesting if your thesis were about challenging this (even it meant proving its validity).

    I also really like your second to last paragraph in which you discuss architectures relationship to economic processes. I think there is a compelling thesis in this narrative I just dont think you have found it yet.

  4. James you are definitely on to something. The best resource I can provide is a super jury thesis project by Bruce Molino (Syracuse ’06). Entitled 33% it focused on the Creative Economy of cities as a means to create resilience in rust belt cities. Using Buffalo as a site he identified areas of issues/opportunity, created phases to cover each, and designed the first phase. I have scanned much of his thesis book and could readily send it to you.

    Exploring the “Creative Economy” of Richard Florida would interested you if you haven’t gotten to it yet, and this is what Bruce uses to plan and design an architecture to enable a new creativity for resilience.

  5. James

    I cam across some notes from when we first presented our abstracts to each other a long time ago it seems now. I ma not sure if they are still relevant but I will mention them.

    – interest in changing production process
    – production patterns/housing patterns/landscape of economics
    – the images you showed were very provocative – do not forget those – aerials

  6. I can’t believe I am doing this, but… check out pages 50 to 63 in Bjark Ingels’ Yes is More! in which he advances the notion of fostering synergy between “economy” and “ecology.”

    Not wanting to sound like Korman, your abstract “makes me nervous.” The first 90% is a primer on shrinking-cities economics, explaining that cities like Detroit or Syracuse are dying because they have stubborn economies. (This could be drastically condensed.) At the last minute, you clue us in to what you’re planning for yourself: speculation and branding. These two suggestions could be provocative, but given your vagueness on ‘how’ you will speculate and/or brand, it unfortunately seems like you’re stating the obvious.

    I think Timothy’s notes (directly above) are particularly prescient, and I strongly endorse his suggestions.

  7. Also: check out David Sokol’s “Property Development + Progressive Architecture = The New Alliance” (a special edition of AD magazine) on reserve at the ARR.

Leave a comment